CrownJudgment: 28 November 2007JUDGMENT OF THE COURTA. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.B. There will be no order for costs.REASONS[1 ...

. These largely reflect thegrounds which were rejected by the Court of Appeal. They are designed to attackthe lawfulness of the sentence of preventive ...

No. 334 (QL), and [2004] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 31 (QL). [2] The appeal was dismissed at the conclusion of the hearing with reasons to follow. These are the ...

workplace” and I decline to do so. [25] As I have noted, I would allow this appeal. [26] SMITH, J.A.: I agree. [27] LOWRY, J.A.: I agree. [28] HALL, J ...

want to have the benefit of the views of the Court of Appeal, as theCourt with the principal responsibility for keeping sentence levels under review ...

counsel for the applicantwhen so requested by him.[5] As the Court of Appeal correctly recorded:[58] In fact [counsel’s] role as amicus seems to have ...

case, for the reasons expressed above. VI. CONCLUSION [50] I would allow the appeal, set aside the order of 23 March 2006, and order that the Writ ...

indirectly to their children for whom support is sought. [7] I would dismiss the appeal. [8] NEWBURY, J.A.: I agree. [9] SAUNDERS, J.A.: I agree. [10 ...

months challenged by the Appellant in her notices of objection and appeal, September and October 2003, the Respondent argues that the Appellant had ...

F.C.J. no. 1720 (QL), 2005 FCA 334, handed down by the Federal Court of Appeal on October 17, 2005. In my view, from the moment that the workers were ...